<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Daily Whig</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dailywhig.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dailywhig.com</link>
	<description>A Modern Whig Perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:04:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama tightening Mexican border security by ben</title>
		<link>http://dailywhig.com/2009/03/24/obama-tightening-mexican-border-security/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailywhig.com/?p=105#comment-122</guid>
		<description>i hate mexicans and they should come over legally, you stupid beaners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hate mexicans and they should come over legally, you stupid beaners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Steele providing more GOP entertainment by Тарас</title>
		<link>http://dailywhig.com/2009/05/22/steele-providing-more-gop-entertainment/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Тарас</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 07:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailywhig.com/?p=212#comment-121</guid>
		<description>Я, хоть и не ваш постоянный читатель, но всё же скажу свое мнение. На ваш сайт попал случайно. Однако нашел много чего нового и интересного. Так что, как говорится, АФФТАР ПЕШИ ИСЧО! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Я, хоть и не ваш постоянный читатель, но всё же скажу свое мнение. На ваш сайт попал случайно. Однако нашел много чего нового и интересного. Так что, как говорится, АФФТАР ПЕШИ ИСЧО! <img src='http://dailywhig.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama tightening Mexican border security by zoey la mexicana and proud!</title>
		<link>http://dailywhig.com/2009/03/24/obama-tightening-mexican-border-security/comment-page-1/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>zoey la mexicana and proud!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 23:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailywhig.com/?p=105#comment-120</guid>
		<description>Oky, where do i start, my mom crossed that border 19 years ago. Not really wanting to go, being forced by he exhusband. My mom was yes a beaner and all very poor, but made it to America. She had me and my 4 sisters years later. my mom really struggled to get a job and take care of her 5 kids. I as an Mexican/American say yes it was wrong how she snuck into the us, but really she had no choice. maybe if the Mexican laws werent to strickt on what you need for a Passprot, not so many people would sneak in. My mom paid top dollar for a lawer to be able to get a Passport but no good came from it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oky, where do i start, my mom crossed that border 19 years ago. Not really wanting to go, being forced by he exhusband. My mom was yes a beaner and all very poor, but made it to America. She had me and my 4 sisters years later. my mom really struggled to get a job and take care of her 5 kids. I as an Mexican/American say yes it was wrong how she snuck into the us, but really she had no choice. maybe if the Mexican laws werent to strickt on what you need for a Passprot, not so many people would sneak in. My mom paid top dollar for a lawer to be able to get a Passport but no good came from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on To Paul McKain: Rush isn&#8217;t that bad? by Brian</title>
		<link>http://dailywhig.com/2010/01/14/to-paul-mckain-rush-isnt-that-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 15:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailywhig.com/?p=233#comment-119</guid>
		<description>You may have out of staters fooled, but those of us in Marion County who lived through the blowout loss to Sheriff Dean know the real deal. As of November 20, 2009, there were only six registered Florida Whigs in the county. This number INCLUDES Truesdell, his best friend, his employee, and his wife. Marion County has 28 other minor parties with more registrants than the Whigs. For a minor party that boasts being in existance since 2007 and boasting a 100% increase in membership since 2008, I&#039;m sorry pigeon but I don&#039;t think that is going to cut it when you look at the statewide statistics, with Marion County being a good sample as the home turf. In Marion County, the Whigs are at 0.003 percent of the electorate, though they do account for a very high percentage in the Truesdell home. The Sherrif Dean farce could have been won by a competent Republican, especially since most of the constitutional officers in the country are Republicans. Be leery of this guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may have out of staters fooled, but those of us in Marion County who lived through the blowout loss to Sheriff Dean know the real deal. As of November 20, 2009, there were only six registered Florida Whigs in the county. This number INCLUDES Truesdell, his best friend, his employee, and his wife. Marion County has 28 other minor parties with more registrants than the Whigs. For a minor party that boasts being in existance since 2007 and boasting a 100% increase in membership since 2008, I&#8217;m sorry pigeon but I don&#8217;t think that is going to cut it when you look at the statewide statistics, with Marion County being a good sample as the home turf. In Marion County, the Whigs are at 0.003 percent of the electorate, though they do account for a very high percentage in the Truesdell home. The Sherrif Dean farce could have been won by a competent Republican, especially since most of the constitutional officers in the country are Republicans. Be leery of this guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on To Paul McKain: Rush isn&#8217;t that bad? by Jason Rogoski</title>
		<link>http://dailywhig.com/2010/01/14/to-paul-mckain-rush-isnt-that-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Rogoski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailywhig.com/?p=233#comment-118</guid>
		<description>This is sad and comical. Only the Modern Whig Party could turn a statement of condolences to Haiti into an attack on the Florida Whig Party and  a Retired firefighter who invented a device that stops kids from getting trapped and killed at the bottom of pools. 

I will keep in mind that this is from Mike in NY who his own chairman says is not capable of taking care of the responsibility that were offered to him. I believe it was Manhattan area? 

You commented how your glad that Florida was no longer part of the Modern Whigs. did you ever know that this blog is what started the steps for Florida to leave the Moderns? You made issue that the people of Florida must have been Republican because they were running 3 candidates against 3 Democratic held districts. Guess after they had two more congressional candidates announce against 2 Republicans that  argument went out the window. 

There must be no communication in the  NY chapter or you would have known that just last Wednesday your state chair Gene was on the phone with Florida begging them to come back to the Moderns and to help him become the next Chairman of the Modern Whigs due to the fact that now Chairwomen Stephens is also resigning. 

You must have just figured McKain as the easy target. Well, you made it easy by misquoting him from your own article. I will add it for you .

&quot;For starters, why is Rush Limbaugh such a sore topic with this guy? I get frustrated when someone makes up statistics and then expects everyone to agree. “However, for all the people that love him there are two that hate him.” This goes to the credibility of the writer. I would love to know where he got this statistic. Rush does have the #1 talk show in the country, so he must be doing something right.&quot;

To me it looks like he was pointing out how as a registered Democrat you were very sensitive about  Rush Limbaugh. He also pointed out your made up statistics and questioned your credibility as a writer. You never did bother to state where you got your statistics from by the way. I think he then pointed out that Limbaugh must being doing something right based on his ratings. I don&#039;t recall McKain ever stating his support of Limbaugh. Pick up the phone and call him. I&#039;m sure he will tell you what he really thinks of Rush. But your attempted twist was almost worth it. 

It must be hard being an activist without even putting your shoes on. I have heard the Moderns described as a &quot;phone book party&quot; I think the correct description should be a &quot;computer keyboard party&quot; 

Gene was right about you. You are out there. Even Lebowitz once told me that you were a nut when I contacted him about you. 

Okay now I submit this and then you reply with some other reason why Florida is _________. I will let you fill in the blank. You are good at that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is sad and comical. Only the Modern Whig Party could turn a statement of condolences to Haiti into an attack on the Florida Whig Party and  a Retired firefighter who invented a device that stops kids from getting trapped and killed at the bottom of pools. </p>
<p>I will keep in mind that this is from Mike in NY who his own chairman says is not capable of taking care of the responsibility that were offered to him. I believe it was Manhattan area? </p>
<p>You commented how your glad that Florida was no longer part of the Modern Whigs. did you ever know that this blog is what started the steps for Florida to leave the Moderns? You made issue that the people of Florida must have been Republican because they were running 3 candidates against 3 Democratic held districts. Guess after they had two more congressional candidates announce against 2 Republicans that  argument went out the window. </p>
<p>There must be no communication in the  NY chapter or you would have known that just last Wednesday your state chair Gene was on the phone with Florida begging them to come back to the Moderns and to help him become the next Chairman of the Modern Whigs due to the fact that now Chairwomen Stephens is also resigning. </p>
<p>You must have just figured McKain as the easy target. Well, you made it easy by misquoting him from your own article. I will add it for you .</p>
<p>&#8220;For starters, why is Rush Limbaugh such a sore topic with this guy? I get frustrated when someone makes up statistics and then expects everyone to agree. “However, for all the people that love him there are two that hate him.” This goes to the credibility of the writer. I would love to know where he got this statistic. Rush does have the #1 talk show in the country, so he must be doing something right.&#8221;</p>
<p>To me it looks like he was pointing out how as a registered Democrat you were very sensitive about  Rush Limbaugh. He also pointed out your made up statistics and questioned your credibility as a writer. You never did bother to state where you got your statistics from by the way. I think he then pointed out that Limbaugh must being doing something right based on his ratings. I don&#8217;t recall McKain ever stating his support of Limbaugh. Pick up the phone and call him. I&#8217;m sure he will tell you what he really thinks of Rush. But your attempted twist was almost worth it. </p>
<p>It must be hard being an activist without even putting your shoes on. I have heard the Moderns described as a &#8220;phone book party&#8221; I think the correct description should be a &#8220;computer keyboard party&#8221; </p>
<p>Gene was right about you. You are out there. Even Lebowitz once told me that you were a nut when I contacted him about you. </p>
<p>Okay now I submit this and then you reply with some other reason why Florida is _________. I will let you fill in the blank. You are good at that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Florida MWP Candidate Paul McKain Represents Republicans, Not The Middle by To Paul McKain: Rush isn&#8217;t that bad? - The Daily Whig</title>
		<link>http://dailywhig.com/2009/11/02/florida-mwp-candidate-represents-republicans-not-the-middle/comment-page-1/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>To Paul McKain: Rush isn&#8217;t that bad? - The Daily Whig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailywhig.com/?p=221#comment-117</guid>
		<description>[...] I recently had a feud with the Florida Whig Party (thankfully no longer a part of the MWP) where their candidate Paul McKain thought Rush wasn&#8217;t a bad guy. You can read his comments here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I recently had a feud with the Florida Whig Party (thankfully no longer a part of the MWP) where their candidate Paul McKain thought Rush wasn&#8217;t a bad guy. You can read his comments here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama tightening Mexican border security by Alyson</title>
		<link>http://dailywhig.com/2009/03/24/obama-tightening-mexican-border-security/comment-page-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Alyson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailywhig.com/?p=105#comment-116</guid>
		<description>Maggie, I hear your pain and that of other immigrants. You have my heart felt sympathies. I understand the reality of the troubles immigrants face having lived in Texas all of my life. As I kid I played with the kids of immigrant families and even learned to speak Spanish. So the Mexican-American community is close to my heart.

However, there is no need to inject racism into this equation. Because at it&#039;s core, this isn&#039;t an issue of race. It is a straw man with a measure of truth behind it. We know that racism is alive and well within the fringes of the Republican party. I know that at least for my self race is not an issue. Nor do I think it is for the majority of my fellow Whigs. You are an American regardless of the color of your skin.

The problem we have have is with illegal immigration. The reasons we have such heavy regulations on immigration are various and sundry. Among them, there is the criminal element. With the drug trade comes waves of criminals and violence. These people never go through the proper channels and therein lies the problem. We can&#039;t keep track of the bad apples. 

The other big problem is that with an influx of cheap illegal labor comes an increase in the number of Americans who lose their jobs to migrant works. This is also a huge detriment to the Mexican-Americans who came here legally and who pay their taxes.

It&#039;s not immigration we have a problem with. When done properly integration of immigrants into American society contributes to the diversity of our great melting pot and strengthens us as a society. It&#039;s truly a shame that race ever entered the equation. But this is not anything new. Italian and Irish immigrants all faced the same discrimination when they came here at the end of the 19th century. Even legal immigrants were often harassed and pelted with rocks as they got off the boats.

Immigration control exists to protect Americans of all races, religions and creeds. Try not to be so hasty in judgment against those of us who want what&#039;s best for all us. We don&#039;t need to be enemies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maggie, I hear your pain and that of other immigrants. You have my heart felt sympathies. I understand the reality of the troubles immigrants face having lived in Texas all of my life. As I kid I played with the kids of immigrant families and even learned to speak Spanish. So the Mexican-American community is close to my heart.</p>
<p>However, there is no need to inject racism into this equation. Because at it&#8217;s core, this isn&#8217;t an issue of race. It is a straw man with a measure of truth behind it. We know that racism is alive and well within the fringes of the Republican party. I know that at least for my self race is not an issue. Nor do I think it is for the majority of my fellow Whigs. You are an American regardless of the color of your skin.</p>
<p>The problem we have have is with illegal immigration. The reasons we have such heavy regulations on immigration are various and sundry. Among them, there is the criminal element. With the drug trade comes waves of criminals and violence. These people never go through the proper channels and therein lies the problem. We can&#8217;t keep track of the bad apples. </p>
<p>The other big problem is that with an influx of cheap illegal labor comes an increase in the number of Americans who lose their jobs to migrant works. This is also a huge detriment to the Mexican-Americans who came here legally and who pay their taxes.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not immigration we have a problem with. When done properly integration of immigrants into American society contributes to the diversity of our great melting pot and strengthens us as a society. It&#8217;s truly a shame that race ever entered the equation. But this is not anything new. Italian and Irish immigrants all faced the same discrimination when they came here at the end of the 19th century. Even legal immigrants were often harassed and pelted with rocks as they got off the boats.</p>
<p>Immigration control exists to protect Americans of all races, religions and creeds. Try not to be so hasty in judgment against those of us who want what&#8217;s best for all us. We don&#8217;t need to be enemies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on North Korea tests missile, time to disarm? by Alyson</title>
		<link>http://dailywhig.com/2009/04/06/north-korea-tests-missile-time-to-disarm/comment-page-1/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Alyson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailywhig.com/?p=166#comment-115</guid>
		<description>I think that we need to take a balanced, but firm approach to North Korea&#039;s nuclear intentions. Despite all of the moral and ethical objections I have to nuclear weaponry we cannot simply hope that by disarming a handful of weapons that the North Korean government will finally find it&#039;s sanity and follow suit.

However, by threatening to cut off diplomacy as we have in the past, we will only be creating more problems. We tried that with Cuba and it only furthered the resolve of that nation&#039;s leaders to maintain it&#039;s ties to the Soviet Union and briefly gain nuclear power. We need to maintain open ties and consider the possibility of trading with these guys. We need to get them out of this situation of dealers and abusers with North Korea (the abusers) buying up weaponry and materials from the dealers, China and Russia. We need to break their habits.

Then things start to fall into place. They have nowhere else to go but the democratized West. The same thing has been happening in China since the early 1990&#039;s. Once the Soviet Union fell they had nothing else to do but start deregulating their markets and making slow strides toward a free society.

It&#039;s a long process and the &quot;I want my pony now&quot; crowd won&#039;t be pleased with that, least of all the gung-ho warhawks in the Republican and Democratic parties. If push comes to shove, we shove back, but extending a cautious hand of friendship is one of the best options we have. Our military is already stretched far too thin as it is, and redirecting troops to fight a large (militarily) hostile nation would create even more problems than we already have. Ones that we simply cannot afford both in terms of money and the lives of American soldiers. 

Anyway, my rant has become long winded and boring. I&#039;m glad I had the opportunity to toss my two cents into the hat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that we need to take a balanced, but firm approach to North Korea&#8217;s nuclear intentions. Despite all of the moral and ethical objections I have to nuclear weaponry we cannot simply hope that by disarming a handful of weapons that the North Korean government will finally find it&#8217;s sanity and follow suit.</p>
<p>However, by threatening to cut off diplomacy as we have in the past, we will only be creating more problems. We tried that with Cuba and it only furthered the resolve of that nation&#8217;s leaders to maintain it&#8217;s ties to the Soviet Union and briefly gain nuclear power. We need to maintain open ties and consider the possibility of trading with these guys. We need to get them out of this situation of dealers and abusers with North Korea (the abusers) buying up weaponry and materials from the dealers, China and Russia. We need to break their habits.</p>
<p>Then things start to fall into place. They have nowhere else to go but the democratized West. The same thing has been happening in China since the early 1990&#8217;s. Once the Soviet Union fell they had nothing else to do but start deregulating their markets and making slow strides toward a free society.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a long process and the &#8220;I want my pony now&#8221; crowd won&#8217;t be pleased with that, least of all the gung-ho warhawks in the Republican and Democratic parties. If push comes to shove, we shove back, but extending a cautious hand of friendship is one of the best options we have. Our military is already stretched far too thin as it is, and redirecting troops to fight a large (militarily) hostile nation would create even more problems than we already have. Ones that we simply cannot afford both in terms of money and the lives of American soldiers. </p>
<p>Anyway, my rant has become long winded and boring. I&#8217;m glad I had the opportunity to toss my two cents into the hat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Florida MWP Candidate Paul McKain Represents Republicans, Not The Middle by Mary Mangan</title>
		<link>http://dailywhig.com/2009/11/02/florida-mwp-candidate-represents-republicans-not-the-middle/comment-page-1/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Mangan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 20:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailywhig.com/?p=221#comment-114</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a recent interview with Paul McKain, in which he states, &quot;Even the party I’m with, they know that when there is a disagreement between me and the party, they lose. They know that.&quot;

I know he&#039;s on the FWP ticket - but that doesn&#039;t mean he&#039;s their puppet.

Here&#039;s the interview:
http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-16781-Tallahassee-Conservative-Examiner~y2009m12d7-Paul-McKain-What-separates-me-from-Allen-Boyd</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a recent interview with Paul McKain, in which he states, &#8220;Even the party I’m with, they know that when there is a disagreement between me and the party, they lose. They know that.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know he&#8217;s on the FWP ticket &#8211; but that doesn&#8217;t mean he&#8217;s their puppet.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the interview:<br />
<a href="http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-16781-Tallahassee-Conservative-Examiner~y2009m12d7-Paul-McKain-What-separates-me-from-Allen-Boyd" rel="nofollow">http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-16781-Tallahassee-Conservative-Examiner~y2009m12d7-Paul-McKain-What-separates-me-from-Allen-Boyd</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Florida MWP: Whig or Republican? by Pete Bralich</title>
		<link>http://dailywhig.com/2009/10/30/florida-mwp-whig-or-republican/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Bralich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailywhig.com/?p=216#comment-113</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure what the thought process behind the &quot;I hate...&quot; posts are, since Mike has shown this is actually the IP of Kellean Truesdell.  However, the immaturity of the numerous posts is matched by the vitrol and immature response from both men above in their reaction to the blog post.  The MWP is a moderate movement in belief and in action.  I&#039;m not sure how all of this would convince me of the level-headedness of Paul McKain or Paul Truesdell.  Just my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure what the thought process behind the &#8220;I hate&#8230;&#8221; posts are, since Mike has shown this is actually the IP of Kellean Truesdell.  However, the immaturity of the numerous posts is matched by the vitrol and immature response from both men above in their reaction to the blog post.  The MWP is a moderate movement in belief and in action.  I&#8217;m not sure how all of this would convince me of the level-headedness of Paul McKain or Paul Truesdell.  Just my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
